3 Jan 2011

FaceBook and Google : A Valuble Lesson for Telecentre Movement

Wish You all a Happy New Year!

Facebook has become most visited website in 2010 as well as most searched keyword of the year. The "facebook" search term has accounted for 3.48% of all searches, according to Hitwise. And it's a 207% increase of facebook search position from 2009. In US facebook with 8.93% user visits from US alone has beaten Google( 7.10%), Yahoo (6.82%), and YouTube (2.65%).



However, Facebook didn’t beat the traffic garnered by all of Google’s properties combined (9.85%). There are rumors that Facebook is planning to launch their own email and map services. The trend is for facebook to grow much stronger. There is also a trend for Google engineers to join facebook team. However Google who set new standards on web would not give up. It would be interesting to see their battle for supremacy on web. With the fast growing Asian internet users, we can expect more to join facebook membership. The question is how it will affect the members of both Google and facebook. Facebook announced that they have reached 500 million users mark. Google has only 180 million members. Where did rest come from? This mean most of the internet users are in facebook.



Facebook is not only the only rival of Google. Soho is planning to take more Google users with its killer office applications and cloud services. It would be interesting to see how Google will approach this internet war by changing its business plans. Google is already phasing out Google wave and restructuring Google Groups. One thing clear from this case, that there is no permanent king on web. Simple ideas and innovations are shifting balance of power.



When Telecentres were started there was no access to ICT in rural communities. Now individual ownership of computers has grown much. People have opened small one to two computer communication centers. There are new networks of ICT centers are blooming. The model of "Technology for the village" may not hold Telecentres in this growing competition. It’s still a question with 500 million users on facebook, why Telecentres are not becoming rich like facebook? Is this 500 million users does not represent much villagers? We need to findout! Even at telecentre.org we have less than 3000 members of 500 million of those on facebook. In e India Telecentre forum 2010 we had less than 20 members and Only one Telecentre operator who had to make it there with all difficulties.


The new blossoming of business oriented communication and ICT centers seem much sustainable due to their entrepreneurship spirit. But they lack social component of ICT. Hence they will not fulfill the needs of underserved which we are aiming through Telecentres. The current content and services model seems traditional when we compare new services potential in Telecentres. Telecentres would be challenged by their rivals emerging in corners of villages. It is a good scenario in terms of ICT capacity growth, however will not be quite productive in social change, bridging of the social and knowledge gaps and developing the society. Therefore taking an example of Facebook and Google case, Telecentres need to consider newer business and operating model becoming a strong network of social enterprises that provides attractive and valuable content and services to improve quality of human life.

If the Telecentre model that we are enjoying to last long. Telecentres need to change, transforming new challanges to opportunities through Social Innovations to create wealth for Telecentres. Social innovation does not come easy. It’s a spin off process of innovation, research and leadership having practical approaches that works well in rural communities. We have to find a new means of inclusion and engagement of grass roots in the conversation for development. I think that we don’t listen adequately. During several years working with Telecentres, I have found that Telecentre based development is a people driven process. The real champians are those on ground. We need to bring in high moral values and encouraging grassroots leaderships, recognition of good works, creating equal opportunities and transparency as essence of development. Telecentres hence needs to approach the process of development with practical strategies that serves the needs grass root Telecentres and such a development processes to be driven by brain rather than heart.



~ Criticism is something we can avoid easily by saying nothing, doing nothing, and being nothing ~
Aristotle

18 Dec 2010

ශිල්ප සයුර ගැන පුංචි සිත් සටහනක්‌!

ශිල්ප සයුරට වසර 4 යි.



2006 නොවැම්බර් 15 වැනිදා අප කොළඹින් පිටත් උනේ ගමට අළුත් දෙයක් අරගන. අපි එනකන් සබරගමුවේ, මාතර, මොණරාගල සහ හම්බන්තොට නැණසළ 20ක් බලාගන හිටියා. ශිල්ප සයුර නැණසළවලට ගෙනියනකොට සිංහල යුනිකෝඩ් ගම්වල තිබුනේ නෑ. තිස්සමහාරාම ළමයි කළේ නාසා පිංතූර බලන එක. නැණසළ වල වයිරස් පිරිලා. නෙට්වර්ක් වැඩ කළේ නෑ. අපි ශිල්ප සයුර විතරක් නොවේ නැණසළට අලුත් තාක්‍ෂණයත්, නව බලාපොරොත්තු එකතු කළා. පුංචි වැඩසටහන් කරලා ගම නැණසළට එකතු කළා. අපේ කණ්ඩායමත් නැණසලත් එක්ක විශාල උනා. අපිත් හූඟක් දේ ඉගන ගත්තා, අඩුපාඩු හදාගන අපිත් වෙනස් උනා. ශිල්ප සයුරත් දිගටම දියුණු උනා. ශ්‍රී ලංකාව ලබාගත් ප්‍රථම, දෙවන හා තෙවන ජාත්‍යන්තර සම්මාන අපි ගෙන ආවා. අන්තර්ජාලයේ නොතිබුණ කණ්ඩියපිටවැව වගේ ගම් ගණනාවක් ගැන ලෝකය දැනගත්තේ අපි ඒ ගම් වලට ගියාම. වහලා තිබුණ නැණසළ ගණනාවක් නැවත විවෘත කරලා අති සාර්ථක මට්ටමට ඒම අපට සතුටක්. අපි ලබාගත්ත නිදහස් අධ්‍යාපනයටත් , 5 ශිශ්‍යත්වයටත්, ඉන් ලද ශිශ්‍යත්ව ආධාරයටත් දැන් ණය නැහැ කියලා හිතෙන එක සාධාරණ සතුටක්. හැමදාමත් නැණසළ දියුණුවත් ශිල්ප සයුරේ දියුණුවත එකට බැඳී තිබුනා.



ඒක තමා තොරතුරු තාක්‍ෂණයෙන් සංවර්ධනය කියලා අපිට තේරුණේ.
වෙනස් කම් තිබුණත් ගැටළු විසඳාගන එකට වැඩ කිරීම.

ශිල්ප සයුර ගමනේදී අපට හොඳ නරක හැම දෙයක්ම ලැබුනා. ගම්වල දෙමාපියන්ගෙන් ලැබුණු ආශිර්වාදයත්, නැණසළවල සහෝදර සහෝදරියන්ගෙන් ලද ශක්තියත්, ICTA ලද සහයෙනුත්, දේශීය විදේශීය පිළිගැනීමෙනුත් ලද පන්නරය අපට තිරසාර ලෙස මහපොළවේ පැළවෙන්නට අවස්ථාව ලබාදුන්නා.

ඒ අතීතය

මේ වර්ථමානය!

2010 දෙසැම්බර් මාසේ 21 වෙනිදා තායිලන්තයේදී එක්සත් ජාතීන්ගේ
මධ්‍යස්ථානයේ දී "සමාජ සංවර්ධනය සඳහා අනාගතයේ ලෝකයේ නැතුවම බැරි තොරතුරු හා සන්නිවේදන" සම්මන්ත්‍රණයේදී
ශිල්ප සයුර නිබන්ධනය ඉදිරිපත් කෙරෙනවා.

(Future Imperatives of Communication and Information for
Development and Social Change)

මාතෘකාව
Local language e learning at rural Telecentres -
An imperative of ICT for increasing access to education

http://www.jcconference.co.cc/.It

අප මේ ඉදිරිපත් කරන්නේ ඉ ශ්‍රී ලංකාවෙන් බිහිවූ ඉ සමාජයේ , නැණසළේ සහ සිංහල යුනිකෝඩ් සාර්ථකත්වයයි. ඒක අප කවුරුත් එකමුතුව කළ වැඩක් ලෙසයි අප සළකන්නේ. අප කළේ එය ක්‍රියාත්මක කිරීමයි. අවුරුදු 5 ක ශිල්ප සයුරේ අත්දැකීම් ගැන මහාවංශය වගේ ලියන්න පුළුවන්. විශාල චරිත ගණනාවක්, සිදුවීම් සහිත රසවත් කථාවක් ඒක.

ශිල් සයුර ව ICT4D පර්යේෂණයක්!
අවුරුදු 4 ක මහ පොළවේ කළ මනා අත්හදා බැලීමක්
එය සාර්ථකයි!
ඒ අත්දැකීම චිශාලනය කරලා
අපේ රටේ ග්‍රාමීය අධ්‍යාපනයේ
ගැටළු විසඳාලීමෙන්
ලොකු වෙනසක් කරන්න
පුළුවන් කියලා අපට හිතෙන්නේ ඒකයි!

ඔබේ සහය ලැබේනම් අපට ඒක කරන්න පුළුවන්!

ශිල්ප සයුර 2011 දැන් අවසාන අදියරේ.
ජනවාරියේදී සූදානම්!

අනාගතය ගැන අනාවැකි කියන්න බැරි උනත්,
මේ දක්වා ශිල්ප සයුර තුලින් ගම්වල දුප්පත් සිසුන් ලබාගත් දියුණුව ගැන අපට සතුටුයි.

ඔබටත් මේ ගැන කියන්න යමක් ඇති.
අහන්න ආසයි අපටත් කියන්න.

http://www.shilpasayura.org
http://www.telecenter.lk



2007 Video

19 Nov 2010

The wastelands as economic alternatives




The vast chunks of wastelands and draught pro lands creates an economic alternative as biofuels production pockets in the country for biofuel development programs. UN Food and Agriculture Organisation recently published a major report on jatropha, lauding the crop’s “Potential for Pro-Poor Development” in many regions of the world with certain conditions, similar to those in Andhra Pradesh.




More

http://ourworld.unu.edu/en/not-all-biofuels-are-bad-a-rural-india-case/

14 Oct 2010

Economy and Eco Systems : A Tight Link

Ecosystems are indispensible for the survival of humans. if the biological diversity in our world is disappearing at this pace, we will soon eliminate the basis of our future existence and also the future economy. Hence it's essaintial that all stakeholders join hands and pool resources and efforts to protect global environment.



Economy and ecology are interdependent in each other hence a constant loss of biological diversity is major concern of business as it risks of increasing procurement costs, transportation costs. New government regulation and changing customer preferences also impact business. Bio-diversity is influenced with emotions and also innovation potential, hence offers businesses new opportunities and competitive adavantages.



Hence its important corporations take biodiversity management into their product planning and projects to ensure success in business while protecting biodiversity. The procument, production, marketing, sales and distribution, R & D and HR departments develop activities in sites and facilities, supply chains and material, prodcution and manufacturing processes and transport and logistics and personal which impact bio-diversity. Impact happen in bio-diversity are habitat change, Polution, climate change, invasive species, over exploitation. The business impacts are costs, brand vaue, prices, risk migitation and innovation. Combining thease impacts in a positive manner can help sustainable business development.





Using large amounts of energy, raw material, transport that emits carbaon, businesses impact heiavily on bio-diversity. The new constructions for office buildings, manufacturing facilities change habitats. If a wetland is used for a construction site, it will destroy the habitat and increse emitting of greenhouse gasses. Extracting rock from querries ploutes air and creates lung sickness among animals and humnas. Mutsui Sumitomo constructed a roof top garden of 7000 m2 in their corporate head quaters, in Tokyo.

Supply of raw materials and supply chain management need to incorporate bio-diversity ideas. large extraction of certiain material can change eco-system. Wood, Food, Fish, mineral industries need to re-consider their business practices. Product or service design need to reduce negative impacts on environment. This can be done increasing substituting, reducing and recycling options. . Positive effects can be created by using materials that contributes to the environmental conservation. Combining part of sales to a particular project is an idea.

Manufacturing emmits waste water, greenhouse gases and hazardous material that negatively impact biological diversity. The production processes needs to be optimized through improved process designs to reduce raw materials and energy needs, that reduce production costs. sustainable fish farms make less impact on environment than marine fishing.


Water is essential and scarce good. Rain water harwesting and storage in underground cisterns and collecting tanks, can reduce water required for manufacturing. A Brazilian organic sugar producer developed a new green production system, replacing traditional burnt cane harvesting which lead to biodiversity levels 23 times higher than in conventional sugarcane farms.

Transportation in business leads to the emission of greenhouse gases and dust and impact micro habitats. Increasing transportation may take invasive species to new habitats and displace native species. climate change also can modify behavior of species, reproduction, competitiveness and feeding relationships, leading to shifts of habitats.

The employees of the organisation need to train on bio diversity management to help their decision making. Their volunteering time help protect biological diversity in the neighbershoods. It can also strengthen business and employee identity. Fujitsu group staff take part in reforestation in Thailand, Borneo and in Vietnam. They have planted 1.18 million trees in 670 ha of land. Similarly there can be wide range of effects on bio-diversity and business success.


Reference : Hand Book of Bio Diversity Management